Archive-Opsec

Search

/ to open · ↑↓ to move · Enter to open

Indexes guides, archive entries, news, resources and sources. Nothing is sent to a third party.

Guide categories

Privacy

What Privacy Actually Means

A working definition of privacy, the four kinds people mean, and why the word gets used to sell things.

Privacy is one of those words that gets used to mean four different things, and most disagreement about privacy online comes from people quietly meaning different ones.

Four different things

Privacy as secrecy. Nobody should be able to read my messages. This is the part encryption addresses, and it is the part that is technically easiest to reason about.

Privacy as context. What I do should not be public in a form that reveals more than it needs to. A bank knows my balance; a bank does not need to know my browsing history to send me a statement. This is data minimisation, and it is the part that is hardest to buy off the shelf.

Privacy as control. I should be able to see, correct, and delete what is recorded about me. This is the substance of rights such as access and erasure, and it is a property of a process, not of a database.

Privacy as autonomy. I should be able to act without an audience. Not being watched is a precondition for doing things that are new, embarrassing, or illegal where you live.

What privacy is not

Privacy is not the same as anonymity. Anonymity is a stronger property: it means the action cannot be tied to a person at all. Most people want privacy, not anonymity, and most privacy tools are sold as if they delivered anonymity. They usually do not.

Privacy is also not secrecy by obscurity. Moving your accounts to new usernames does nothing if the same profile is reconstructed from your behaviour, your contact list, or a single forwarded screenshot.

The trade that is actually being offered

Almost every free service is funded by advertising, which means its business model is to share an audience description with third parties. A privacy-preserving service is one that has found some other way to pay, or has decided not to collect the data. Both are fine outcomes. What is not fine is presenting a data-extracting business model as a privacy feature.

A workable starting position

You do not need to solve all of this. In rough order of value for most people:

  1. Stop credential reuse, and turn on multi-factor authentication
  2. Reduce the number of services that hold data about you
  3. Turn off location history and ad personalisation where they exist
  4. Encrypt the device and the network
  5. Worry about adversaries you do not actually have

Steps 1 to 4 are unglamorous and effective. Step 5 is where most online privacy advice goes, and for most people it is where effort stops being repaid.

Sources

  • Surveillance Self-Defense — EFF’s threat-modelling guides, the best free introduction to thinking about this systematically.

Continue with harm reduction for beginners or define your threat model.

Sources

  1. Surveillance Self-Defense Electronic Frontier Foundation non-profit Accessed
  2. Data Protection by Design and by Default European Union regulator Accessed